Wednesday, 20 July 2011

  • No consensus as Europe limps toward Greece summit (Reuters)

    BRUSSELS/PARIS (Reuters) ? European government officials and commercial bankers struggled to reconcile competing proposals for a second bailout of Greece Monday, just three days before a summit meeting called to prevent the crisis from spreading through the region.

    French government spokeswoman Valerie Pecresse said she believed the summit of the euro zone's 17 national leaders scheduled for Thursday in Brussels would agree on a rescue of Greece, supplementing a 110 billion euro ($154 billion) bailout launched in May last year.

    But after three weeks of preparatory talks, it was unclear how a consensus could be reached on a way for private owners of Greek government bonds -- banks, insurers and other investors -- to contribute to the bailout by taking cuts in the face value of their holdings.

    Imposing a small tax on all euro area banks is under active consideration as a possible alternative to more risky forms of private sector involvement, a source familiar with the talks said, confirming a German media report.

    The source also said officials were considering measures to try to prevent the fallout from the Greek crisis from damaging financial markets globally.

    Fears that the rescue of Greece might fail, leading eventually to a disorderly debt default, pushed the euro down against other currencies and bond yields of highly indebted euro zone governments rose. Italy's 10-year yield climbed over 0.2 percentage point to a euro-era high.

    Paul de Grauwe, a professor of international economics at Leuven University in Belgium who has informally advised European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, said politicians had delayed taking decisive action on Greece for so long that their options were narrowing fast.

    "I'm afraid to hope. I still hope, yes, but I'm not optimistic," he said.

    "We've had solutions in the past, but we haven't grasped them. Now it's too late for some of those solutions to work any more; the opportunity has been lost."

    RANGE OF SCHEMES

    Officials are wrestling with a range of proposed schemes for Europe's bailout fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, to finance a voluntary buy-back or swap of Greek bonds, or possibly both. The schemes would be conducted at a discount to the bonds' face value, helping to reduce Greece's 340 billion euro mountain of sovereign debt.

    But all of the schemes could face technical and legal obstacles, in some cases requiring the approval of national parliaments in the euro zone, and they risk fuelling market instability if credit rating agencies respond by declaring Greece in limited default.

    The source familiar with the negotiations said the tax on banks, which might substitute for those schemes, could raise 10 billion euros a year, yielding 30 billion euros over three years -- the sum which Germany and other countries have set as the benchmark for the private sector's contribution.

    Asked about the apparent unfairness of making banks not exposed to Greek debt share the burden with those that do have exposure, the source said the tax could be structured to fall mainly on investors with the most exposure. He did not say how.

    "This has been discussed for a few weeks but never really got momentum. Lately it's been getting a bit more. The Germans say they are not against it. It would be a form of private sector involvement without the collateral damage of triggering a credit event or a selective default," the source said.

    But any contribution by the private sector is unlikely to be nearly enough to solve Greece's problem. Analysts have estimated its debt would need to be roughly halved, to 80 percent of gross domestic product, to make it manageable in the long run.

    A bond swap might have the most impact.

    But a European Union official source told Reuters that any agreement on a swap this week would probably be quite small, merely paving the way for a debate on a bigger restructuring of Greek debt that would have to take place in a few months' time.

    "What we're talking about down the road is the need for a massive reduction in the debt burden, and they are just not ready to do that yet," said Guntram Wolff, deputy director of the Bruegel think tank and previously a senior economist at DG Ecfin, the European Commission unit dealing with the crisis.

    "It will require some form of substantial debt restructuring and you have to see who is going to take the hit, will it be the taxpayers or will it be the banks? To carry out such a move you need to prepare, and they don't have the time to prepare before Thursday."

    BAILOUT

    As part of the second bailout, officials have also been looking at other measures to help Greece including up to 60 billion euros of additional emergency loans from European governments and the International Monetary Fund; steps to recapitalise Greek and European banks; and ways to stimulate Greek economic growth.

    EU sources said there was a basic agreement on extending the maturities and lowering the interest rates for bailout loans extended to Greece, Ireland and Portugal. Greece's EU loans have maturities of about 7.5 years with a rate of 4 percent; their length might be doubled or even quadrupled, and the rate cut by at least 0.5 percentage point.

    But de Grauwe said the mood of financial markets was now so negative that such a step might not help weak euro zone states regain the ability to fund themselves.

    "If that was to be a solution, it's a solution we should have implemented months ago, when it would have worked."

    There has also been talk of expanding the 750 billion euro bailout facility which the EU and the IMF created last year as the debt crisis erupted. The EU source said there probably would not be enough time to agree on the idea this week.

    The source familiar with the negotiations said that to reassure global markets, governments were considering proposals to make the EFSF more flexible by, for example, allowing it to recapitalise banks or provide precautionary credit lines.

    Euro zone leaders may also issue a statement declaring Greece is a unique case, to try to convince private investors they will not be called on to help pay for bailouts of countries such as Ireland and Portugal. After recent credit rating downgrades, however, many investors are assuming the worst.

    IMF

    Another concern is that the IMF and other major governments around the world may lose patience with Europe.

    German newspaper Die Welt quoted diplomatic sources as saying the IMF was angered by Europe's unsuccessful crisis management and that "influential parties" in the Fund wished not to take part in further bailouts of Greece. It did not elaborate.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Monday that Europe had to act more forcefully to contain risks in its banking sector, which is heavily exposed to Greek, Irish and Portuguese sovereign debt.

    Former U.S. Treasury Secretary and White House adviser Lawrence Summers, writing in a column contributed to Reuters on Sunday, said Europe should move much more aggressively than it had done so far to prevent the Greek crisis from damaging both the region's single currency and the global economic recovery.

    He recommended steps including sharp cuts in interest paid on bailout loans, allowing countries to buy European Union guarantees for their issues of new debt, and a menu of options for private investors to become involved.

    "It is to be hoped that European officials can engineer a decisive change in direction but if not, the world can no longer afford the deference that the IMF and non-European G20 officials have shown toward European policymakers over the last 15 months," Summers wrote.

    Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/business/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110718/bs_nm/us_eurozone_debt

    hotwire sudoku calvin klein nws diarrhea diarrhea fight club

Tuesday, 19 July 2011

  • Business Process Outsourcing Can Help Companies Save Money ...

    Business Process Outsourcing Can Help Companies Save Money

    Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) is hiring another company to handle business for you. BPO is different from Information Technology (IT) outsourcing. While IT outsourcing focuses on hring a company to develop applications, testing and other works, BPO takes care of Human Resources, Accounting anf Finance ad other related services.

    Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) has two distinct branches of outsourcing ? Back office outsourcing whichtypically involves functions like human resources, accounting and finance and Front office outsourcing that has services related to customer related and contact center.

    BPO that is contracted outside a company?s country is called offshore outsourcing and BPO that is contracted to a company?s neighboring country is called nearshore outsourcing.

    BPO is a division of Outsourcing that comprises of contracting of operations and responsibilities of a particular area of business functions, to a third party service provider. Though outsourcing has been there in industries from a long time, it is now more organized and recognized. For instance, manufacturing industries typically have big divisions such as suppy chain that require services to handle

    Since BPO is close to Information Technology industry, it is generally known as information technology enabled service or ITES providing cost?effective customer support.

    BPO can be both fruiful and harmful too. Though it increases the outsourcing company?s flexibility, management needs to take cautious steps before embarking on a BPO.

    Capital can be set flowing and a variable cost structure can be imposed giving a company a choice to create changes as per the requirements. BPO allows a company to focus on its core competencies without being loaded by the stress of technical restraints. Key employees can be freed from non core processes and given time to focus on their actual core areas. This creates a cutthroat edge in the company. BPO can contribute to the increase in speed of business processes. Business emergencies can be avoided by companies and retain their goals in the right perspective. A company would be able to nurture at a quicker speed with the flexibility that a BPO would give.

    Areas where problems arise in practice due to BPOs are service levels, unclear contractual issues, changing requirements, and unexpected changes. Such challenges are not favorable to a company?s growth. A dependence on a BPO would reduce flexibility on operations of a company. Acompany would be risking its information system due to a increased security threat.

    The sense of ownership is lost. Employees no longer feel emotionally involved to many functions in the organization. Running costs may be underestimated leading to a major risk.

    ?

    ?

    Lavainfotech is a growing software company with a passion for delivering on time and to the satisfaction of the customers. The company offers BPO services and has a?commitment?towards providing the best customer support to clients.

    Source: http://eboden.org/?p=8288

    nancy grace emirates emirates hilary duff lagos mac miller casino royale

Saturday, 07 May 2011

Friday, 06 May 2011

paulanichols20

  • Visit paulanichols20's Xanga Site
    • Member Since: 3/10/2011

Recommended

[no recommendations]

Groups

[no groups]